video2zero

the business the art and the science of new media

Improving web video: 3.Camera

lenses.jpg

Size does matter. It’s not about pixels it’s about control.

You’ve seen them - reviews comparing the $40K Sony XDCAM to video cameras costing over $100K. The XDCAM compares very favorably.

Or user testimonials boasting that the $10K Canon XLH1 produces images that areĀ  indistinguishable from those of the XDCAM. The $4k Canon XH-A1 is touted as “almost identical” to the XLH1, and dozens of users claim that the $800 HV20 matches perfectly with the A1.

It is surely not unreasonable to suggest then that the HV20 can stand alongside cameras costing 100 times the price.

Not surprising really this notion has been bedrock testament in the camera world for over 70 years. Ken Rockwell’s “Why Your Camera Does Not Matter” has had millions of page views over the past couple of years:

Your equipment DOES NOT affect the quality of your image. The less time and effort you spend worrying about your equipment the more time and effort you can spend creating great images.

This is great news if all you care about is the quality of your image.

And what else is there to care about?

Well there are a couple of things, Ken continues:

The right equipment just makes it easier, faster or more convenient for you to get the results you need.

So if you are concerned with ease, speed or convenience then your camera might matter. Not the number of pixels the camera can collect - but the amount of control you have over the way they are collected.

The less control you have over the shoot the more control you need over the camera.

At a minimum a video camera has controls for focus and exposure which need to finessed while filming. Add in exposure lock, focus lock, exposure compensation, white balance, filters, gain, audio levels etc - and my left hand might access a dozen buttons or dials many times during a shoot. The more shooter/subject move the more adjustments required.

It is difficult to find all those controls - let alone manipulate them confidently - on an HV20.

Having controls buried in menus is the second biggest “gotcha” impacting the usability of consumer cams in demanding environments.

The biggest “gotcha” of course is “digital zoom”. But I don’t think that one fools many people these days.

Go here for an article on controlling exposure for the HV20


Oct 16th, 2007 • Category: Online Video, Video production

5 Responses »

  1. [...] shooting by numbers - value added video â

  2. I really hear you on the “controls buried in sub-menus” thing. They might as well not be there for run and gun style work. What camera would you recommend to get the best cost/control benefit?

  3. I really like the Canon XL series - I’ve used every one from the original XL1 through to the XLH1. Currently shoot with an XLH1 and have an XL1s for backup. Guy I shoot with a lot uses an XL2. Great bang for the buck. The XLH1 is an incredible camera - really very close to the XDCAMs. But if you don’t need HD then a used XL1s or XL2 is a good bet. Stay away from the XL1 if you work in low-light much. It’s a great cam but low light performance is HORRIBLE!

  4. need to buy a camera for double duty - needs to be web friendly (connecting to laptop), but using miniDV tapes, at least prosumer quality. Please help! I’m completely ignorant - only ever used a DVX-100B for a weekend - a little overwhelming for a novice.
    Thanks

  5. check out the forums at dv.com - if you edit on a mac I would lean towards canon, if PC then sony.

Leave a Reply

» Subscribe to RSS comment feed for this thread